Logo

Gimbals vs Steadicams for Professional Video Production

October 15, 2021

Lights, camera, action - and shaky footage. Whether you are a professional videographer or an enthusiastic amateur, shaky video footage can make your work look less polished and less professional. So, what do you do when you need ultra-smooth footage while on the move? You have two options: use a gimbal or use a steadicam. But which is better for professional video production? In this post, we will provide an unbiased comparison between gimbals and steadicams so you can pick the right tool for your next project.

Gimbal vs Steadicam: What's the Difference?

First things first, what are gimbals and steadicams?

Gimbals are motorized camera stabilizers. They use three axes of motion to cancel out any movement made by the camera operator. The result is a smooth, steady shot, with natural movements.

Steadicams are mechanical stabilizers that use counterweights to stabilize the camera's motion. The camera is mounted on a sled, and the operator controls the camera by holding the sled's handle. Steadicams are typically more adjustable than gimbals, allowing for greater flexibility in the final shot.

Pros and Cons of Gimbals

Let's start with the gimbal. Here are its advantages and drawbacks:

Advantages:

  • Gimbals are lightweight and portable.

  • They can produce consistently smooth footage for long periods.

  • Gimbals are easy to use and require little training.

Drawbacks:

  • Gimbals require a power source such as batteries or a power bank, which adds to their overall cost.

  • They are less flexible than steadicams, with limited range of motion.

  • Gimbals are less effective at reducing vertical movement, such as when the operator is walking.

Pros and Cons of Steadicams

Now let's look at steadicams. Here are their advantages and drawbacks:

Advantages:

  • Steadicams are more flexible, allowing for a wider range of motion and more creative camera movements.

  • They are more effective than gimbals at reducing vertical movement.

  • Steadicams are not reliant on a power source, making them more cost-effective over time.

Drawbacks:

  • Steadicams require a lot of training and practice to use effectively.

  • They are heavier and less portable than gimbals, which can be a disadvantage on long or demanding shoots.

  • They can produce less consistent results than gimbals, especially in the hands of an inexperienced operator.

Which One Should You Choose?

When it comes to choosing between a gimbal and a steadicam, there is no one-size-fits-all answer. It depends on the type of video you are shooting, your budget, and your level of experience.

As a general rule, gimbals are more suitable for fast-paced, action-packed shoots, where you need to move quickly and capture smooth footage. They are also a great option for low-budget productions or those with limited crew.

On the other hand, steadicams are better suited for slower, more controlled shots that need a greater range of motion, such as filming a person walking through a crowd or down a street. They require more skill to use, and a greater budget, but can produce stunning results in the hands of a skilled operator.

Conclusion

Comparing gimbals vs steadicams for professional video production is like comparing apples to oranges - while they are both camera stabilizers, they are designed for different purposes. We hope this unbiased comparison has helped you understand the strengths and weaknesses of both gimbals and steadicams so you can choose the right tool for your next shoot.

References

© 2023 Flare Compare